Выступления Младена Долара и Славоя Жижека

 
21.06.2013
 
Факультет политических наук; Факультет социологии

22 августа

  • 17.00—19.00 Младен Долар (Университет Любляны, Словения), Академия Ван Эйк, Нидерланды): WHAT, IF ANYTHING, IS AN ATOM 
  • 20.00 – Показ фильма арт-группы «Что делать» «Русский лес» (2012)

 

What, if anything, is an atom?
The ancient atomism was the first appearance of materialism in the history of philosophy, so the stakes in conceiving the atom, as a philosophical entity, are very high. The very fate of materialism and idealism is involved in this simple question, and hence the nature of philosophy. One could say ‘tell me what you see in the atom and I’ll tell you who you are’.
Three stories will be told. The first one is the Hegelian account of atomism, which essentially sees in it the advent of the notions of one, the void and their split. For Hegel, the great admirer of the speculative insight of ancient atomism, its great merit was to introduce ‘one’ by submitting being to count and to a split. For Hegel, the indivisible particle is not the atom, but what is indivisible is ultimately the division itself, the driving force of negativity inscribed in any entity.
The second story is that of clinamen, the notion introduced into atomism by Epicurus (and expounded by Lucretius), which is the story of a contingent swerve which befalls the atoms, and hence something that inherently departs and undermines ‘the one and the void’. The clinamen story was much criticized and ridiculed by the great philosophical tradition, including by Hegel. Very young Karl Marx stood up for the crucial value of clinamen (in his dissertation on the philosophy of nature in Democritus and Epicurus), and on his tracks in recent times Louis Althusser and Gilles Deleuze.
The third story is that of den, a curious neologism introduced by Democritus, which perhaps undermines both stories at the outset. For if atom is den, then it is not a body, not an entity, not one, not being, but also not non-being. It is a paradoxical departure from the bulk of ontology, an ontological scandal, obfuscated by the subsequent Aristotelian paradigm. Jacques Lacan took it up as a clue to his notion of the object, the object of psychoanalysis, and so did, curiously and in a different vein, Samuel Beckett.
Do the three stories add up, can one make a single story out of them? Curiously, answering the question ‘what, if anything, is an atom?’ still very much stands at the core of contemporary theoretical battles and engagements.

 23 августа

  • 16.00–19.00 – Славой Жижек (Университет Биркбек, Великобритания, Общество теоретического психоанализа, Любляна, Словения): WELCOME TO THE DESERT OF POST-IDEOLOGY
  • 19.30-21.30 Круглый стол: ЕСТЬ ЛИ СМЫСЛ У ИСТОРИИ? ГОСУДАРСТВО И РЕВОЛЮЦИЯ СЕГОДНЯ. Участвуют: Дмитрий Виленский, Артемий Магун, Алексей Пензин,  Александр Скидан, Оксана Тимофеева (все – члены группы «Что делать?»), Кети Чухров (ГЦСИ, Москва), Младен Долар, Славой Жижек.